Whaling
Should Japan be allowed to hunt Whales?
Hi I’m Green girl and I did my speech on Whaling, mainly Japan and their whaling for research scheme. As you can see behind me these are some of the horrific scenes that take place almost every day out in our oceans.
The hunting of whales has been going on since the 9th century and was quite popular back then as it was a good source of cheap food. Spain was one of the first countries to invest in whaling back then but by the 19th century many other countries were also doing a lot of whaling. It wasn’t until 1986 that the IWC (international Whaling Commission) put a world wide ban on whaling, but this didn’t stop everybody there were a few Rebel countries, mainly Iceland and Norway, that rebelled against the anti whaling laws and still continued to whale and still even do it today. Japan didn’t start whaling till around the end of the major whaling period, they started mainly after the Europeans (who dominated the whaling industry) stopped, that’s when Japan really hit off.
Every year Japan hunts around 2500 whales for “research” but what actually is this “research” they talk of, according to Catalyst (a show on t.v, sort of like the news) of the 6800 whales Japan hunted in the 18 year period the JARPA program (Japan’s whale hunting program) has only printed less then 55 papers on their research. Of those 55 papers only 14 discussed the issues JARPA set out to find out about and out of that, only 4 required lethal sampling. So what happened to all those other whales that lost their life to the so called “research”, well if you were over in Japan you’d probably find them on your plate. Some times you can even find whale products in pet food, fertilizer and even cheap perfumes.
Japan says they are mainly trying to find out the health status of minke whales, which they found was healthy, and they were also trying to see if there were any changes in the eco system of the Antarctic Ocean. They claim that Minke whales in the Antarctic Ocean have very low levels of contaminates in them. So why do they still need to kill more whales? It just doesn’t make sense.
Japan’s whale consumption was at its highest in 1962 at around 226000 tons after this it declined dramatically down to around 15 000 tons in 1985 one year before the ban, but that’s still a lot of whale meat.
In 2006/2007 season Japan took around 866 whales these included:
- 3 Southern Hemisphere fin whales,
- 508 Southern Hemisphere minke whales,
- 197 North Pacific minke whales,
- 51 North Pacific Brydes whales,
- 101 North Pacific sei whales,
- 6 North Pacific sperm whales.
This was one of the first times Japan had taken fin whales, an endangered species, but after this it announced in the next season it would take a further 50 fin whales and 50 humpbacks for “scientific Research”.
Since 1986 Japan has killed 8,201 minke whales but it’s not the only one Iceland and Norway also kill whales, Iceland stuck to the ban for a while only hunting for “scientific” reasons but then decided it was also going to hunt commercially as well. Norway has also hunted a lot of whales commercially as it is under objection to the ban. Norway has taken 6879 minke whales since the ban, even hunting commercially they still haven’t taken as many whales as Japan has for “scientific research”.
The methods Japan uses to hunt whales are totally inhumane and unreasonable. The conditions out at sea are much different to those on land, the sea is not made of solid rock, its fluid it moves and this can dramatically affect the aim of the harpoonist, this means that the whale may not be hit with the fatal blow the first time it may take a couple of shots. This brings up another issue, how exactly are the whales killed, well after the harpoon is fired assuming it hits its target it plunges 30cm into the whales flesh causing great pain before exploding and damaging major organs. If this first shot fails to kill the whale the harpoonist may choose to shoot another harpoon or shot the whale with a gun but what really is a bullet going to do to a mighty beast like that, just cause more prolonged pain and suffering that’s all, more pain and suffering.
In 2002 Norwegian whalers only killed 80.7% of their targets instantly which means for the other 19.7% of whales it was a much more slow and painful, prolonged death. In Japan 2002/2003 the whalers only killed 40.2% of their targets instantly, again another slow painful death on the whales part. If whaling is to continue there should be a much more effective method of killing the whales instantly so as to eliminate unnecessary pain and suffering.
As I was gathering notes to write this speech I found a very interesting web page all about Japans view on whaling and I thought I better put some of it in. The question was;
Aren’t all whales endangered?
Japans answer;
“No whales have never been hunted to extinction, nor are they likely to be. Out of all of the 80 species, only a limited number traditionally have been hunted, such as blue whales, fin whales, minke whales, humpback whales, sperm whales and gray whales.
When whales were over-hunted, species such as blue whales and right whales were reduced to very low population levels, but these species now have been fully protected for decades.
Japan strongly believes that they should continue to be protected.
On the other hand, there are species which are abundant enough that marine management is needed, such as the Antarctic and northwestern Pacific minke whales and northwestern Pacific Bryde’s whales”
quoted exactly from http://www.whaling.jp/english/qa.html
The above quote, although highlighting the fact that certain whales have been fully protected for years, fails to mention the recovery rate of these species, and whether or not they are now off the endangered or vulnerable lists. And whilst they argue that the Antarctic and Northwestern Pacific minke whales and northwestern Bryde’s whales are abundant, and in their opinion require culling, they did not provide evidence to show that the whale numbers were having a negative impact on the marine environment. So is such a drastic action really required?
What is the purpose of hunting if the demand for the meat is not high, nor is it necessary for survival and the uses for the by products can all be sourced alternatively? Add to this the inhumane, slow, painful deaths the whales endure, and again I ask you why bother, what is the point? Research, you say. What answers has the research given us? Basically that minke whales are healthy and live in a relatively healthy and stable environment. Do we really need to kill whales to determine this? I don’t think so.
So to conclude, whale hunting for Japan is a pointless exercise, they are getting nothing out of their research, its not one of their main food supplies nor is it a tradition or a cultural thing. They’d probably get more money from whale watching then selling the meat. It is a totally inhumane way of killing the whales, how would you like something to plunge 30cm into you then blow up, not a nice way to go is it. So I ask please lets all try to stop Japan from continuing this cruel, unethical way of killing. If we don’t stop them soon there may not be any whales left and just think how many of those thousands of whales were mothers, how many calves were orphaned, think back to Colin the whale who was on the news a couple weeks ago, could his mother have abandoned him because she was killed for food? Think about it.